atw: Re: National toilets w/ federal members, are they on the rise?

LOL.

I'm not touching THAT one ... regardless of how badly preponderant it is!

Cheers,

Bruce Ashley






MHT <runfox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
24/08/2007 09:54 AM
Please respond to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


To
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
atw: National toilets w/ federal members, are they on the rise?







I've purchased any number of products as well as worked more than one 
project where technical instructions had been created on the cheap and 
written by a struggling, non-native speaker or translated in Babel Fish. 
And we've all gotten those sleazy e-mails for products that at least 50% 
of us (being female) have utterly no reason to purchase.  It would appear 
that those two worlds have merged, and instructions no longer suffer in 
isolation from cheap authorship.  I doubt that I will be using this 
recently received e-mail as a portfolio example to demonstrate the 
importance of clear and concise professional writing and translations 
(tempting as it is), but it was good for a whopping belly laugh: 

"Chicks always srieked at me and even gentlemans did in the national 
toilet!
Well, now I laugh at them, because I took M eg ad ik
for 6 months and now my member is badly preponderant than federal."

MNMary

Other related posts: