atw: Re: Job ads on austechwriter [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: "Elizabeth Fullerton" <Elizabeth_Fullerton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 09:19:46 +1000
Personally, I like seeing the ads - I'm not actively looking at the
moment, but it's good to get an idea of what's around.
Btw, which side of the crumpet is the face?
Regards
Elizabeth Fullerton
Business Solutions Architect
Infosys Australia
Ph: +61 3 9911 3431
Fax: +61 3 9911 3398
www.infosys.com <http://www.infosys.com/>
Powered by Intellect
Driven by values
________________________________
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Howard.Silcock@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, 7 June 2007 4:25 PM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Job ads on austechwriter [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Maybe we need to agree as a group on our attitude to job ads on
this list. The information about the list says:
This list is a forum for technical writers to discuss the theory and
practice of technical communication. The forum will become an archive of
useful tips and solutions regarding workflow queries, software usage,
project planning, documentation standards...indeed anything of relevance
to the profession of technical authoring.
It doesn't mention job ads, though the last part is pretty vague.
I don't mind the current quantity of ads - and I'd hope that the posters
of the ads to this list might know a bit more about what tech writers
do. But I can imagine it could reach an annoying level and then we might
have to reassess the situation.
Rereading the information I just quoted, I can't now resist observing
that it starts of with 'technical writers', then moves to 'technical
communication' and then finally to 'technical authoring'. Are there some
subtle distinctions being made here, or was the author just using what
Fowler called 'elegant variation'?
Oh dear, here I go again. Some of us just can't read any piece of text
without subjecting it to a critical analysis. (My toaster said 'Crumpets
face inwards' and I started wondering whether it was an exhortation to
the crumpets or a notional definition of the nature of a crumpet. Yes,
maybe I do need to get a life.)
Howard
**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely
for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please
notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are
not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other
person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses.
Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not
liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail.
You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or
attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all
messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this
e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***
- References:
- atw: Job ads on austechwriter [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard . Silcock
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Job ads on austechwriter [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Job ads on austechwriter [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Job ads on austechwriter [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Job ads on austechwriter [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Job ads on austechwriter [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Job ads on austechwriter [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- atw: Job ads on austechwriter [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard . Silcock