atw: Re: It's Vs It is
- From: "Peter G. Martin" <pmartin11@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Craig Hadden <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, atw <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:42:35 +1000
Craig :
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:05:44 +1000 (EST), you wrote:
>
> PM> Go with the flow and rhythm of the spoken language
> PM> wherever you can.
>
> I agree to a degree, but I'd be wary because:
> * A spoken style has a more limited target audience.
> Yesterday, for example, I read some help that said
> such-and-such had just "gotten easier". That might
> have made North American users feel all warm and
> fuzzy, but for many other English speakers (myself
> included), it could induce retching!
Don't think this is really a good example (although of
course there are others that might well crop up to emphasize
some of the limits that may apply in using spoken language
expressions.
The "gotten" use in American English is an interesting
example of the preservation of an older form of grammar in a
"new" (eg. colonial) environment -- much as the Australian
accent is probably a preservation of a fairly widely-used
form of English pronunciation from the late 1700s-early
1800s. "Gotten" does date from earlier English usage.
As such, I don't think it is really an example of
differences between written and spoken idiom. As acceptable
grammar in America, it's likely to be written as well as
spoken.
--Peter M
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
Other related posts: