atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- From: Barry Dale <barrydale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:37:40 +1000
What would be wrong with using "actual values?"
Elizabeth Fullerton wrote:
> Hi all
> Yesterday when we were reviewing a document, we needed to describe
> values-which-are-not-null - and I facetiously (so unlike me, I know!)
> scribbled down "unnull" (it has a nice symmetry, don't you think?).
>
> When I made the change, I said "non-null values". I think this is an
> acceptable term. Unfortunately, "unnull" has hunted me down and bitten
> me on the bum, because the others, knowing I was joking with "unnull"
> are now confusing the two terms, and think "non-null" is also a joke.
> The alternative is the longer "values which are not null".
>
> It's a small thing, but I'd prefer not to write a whole sentence when a
> single, unambiguous word will do the same job. What do you lot think? Is
> non-null actually a valid choice? (Could I possibly be wrong?) Is there
> a better option? Ultimately, for this particular document, it's not
> worth wrangling over, and I will use whichever term causes the least
> trouble (in terms of coming back interminably for changes). But I'm
> interested in your thoughts...
>
> Regards
>
> Elizabeth Fullerton
> Business Solutions Architect
> Infosys Australia
> Tel: +61 3 9911 3529
> Fax: +61 3 9911 3407
> www.infosys.com
> Powered by Intellect
> Driven by values
>
>
>
> **************************************************
> To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
> austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
> austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> "unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
>
> To search the austechwriter archives, go to
> www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
>
> To contact the list administrator, send a message to
> austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> **************************************************
>
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- From: Jonn Mero
- atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- From: Peter G. Martin
- References:
- atw: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- From: Elizabeth Fullerton
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- » atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- From: Jonn Mero
- atw: Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- From: Peter G. Martin
- atw: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?
- From: Elizabeth Fullerton