atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard.Silcock@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 10:07:31 +1100
I have to say I'm 100% in agreement with Peter on this one ( though don't
interpret this as a *put*-down, Slinka!).
I can't see any reason to substitute another word for 'put', even in
relatively formal documentation. 'Add' is OK, but directs the reader's
attention a bit unnnecessarily towards the files already there - it would
be slightly strange (though logically impeccable) to use it if there
weren't any files there already. 'Return' is obviously only appropriate in
certain cases.
I'd like it to be a matter of professionalism to stick to ordinary words
that we'd actually say, when we can. That does include 'add' and 'return',
of course. But it also means preferring 'start' and 'end' to 'commence'
and 'terminate', and avoiding many other stilted terms like 'adjacent' and
'co-located'. .
(I should also report that one of my co-workers made the comment that 'put
the file into the folder' doesn't make it clear whether you're moving or
copying. But that's another issue.)
Howard
Peter G Martin <peter.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
28/02/2007 05:22 PM
Please respond to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
<austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
Topic
TRIM File Ref
Slinka:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:50:08 +1100, you wrote:
> Add (or return) files to the folder.....the word “put” sounds
unprofessional.
>
> But definitely ‘put into’........not ‘put in to’
>
>
Put ? What's wrong with put ?
Which profession doesn't like it ?
Perfectly good word. English. Short. Meaningful.
What more could you want ? Positionization ?
--Peter M
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- References:
- atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- From: Peter G Martin
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- From: Peter G Martin