atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard.Silcock@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:08:12 +1100
Yes, but that's exactly the logic that would force us to say 'peas soup',
'cakes shop' and 'four doors car'. I gave these examples to demonstrate
that it doesn't seem to be relevant whether there's more than one of
whatever thing we're talking about.
I think Michelle's reasoning may be on the right track - we do often seem
to use the plural when it comes from a title. (Strictly speaking, I'd say
it's a modifier in that case too - but I still think it could be one of a
type that might be treated differently.)
I don't think that's the whole story, though. There are probably other
cases - that have nothing to do with titles - where you'd use the plural,
but I'll have to give it a bit more thought before I can come up with
examples.
Howard
hedley.finger@xxxxxxxx
Sent by: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
28/02/2007 12:22 PM
Please respond to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Topic
TRIM File Ref
Does the section look after only one medical record? I think not. Then
Medical Records Section it is: "section" qualified by "records" (it's not
the surfing section) qualified in turn by "medical" (it's not 78 LP
records).
--
Hedley Finger
Training Content Developer and Tools Specialist
MYOB Australia Pty Ltd <http://myob.com/au>
P.O. box 371 Blackburn VIC 3130 Australia
12 Wesley Court Tally Ho Business Park East Burwood VIC 3151
Australia
<mailto:hedleyDOTfingerATmyobDOTcom>
Tel. +61 3 9222 9992 x 7421, Mob. (cell) +61 412 461 558
© MYOB Technology Pty Ltd 2007
- References:
- atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: hedley . finger
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: hedley . finger