atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- From: Peter G Martin <peter.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:22:09 +1100
Slinka:
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:50:08 +1100, you wrote:
> Add (or return) files to the folder.....the word ?put? sounds unprofessional.
>
> But definitely ?put into?........not ?put in to?
>
>
Put ? What's wrong with put ?
Which profession doesn't like it ?
Perfectly good word. English. Short. Meaningful.
What more could you want ? Positionization ?
--Peter M
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- From: Elizabeth Fullerton
- atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard . Silcock
- References:
- atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- From: Slinka
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- » atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- From: Elizabeth Fullerton
- atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics. [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard . Silcock
- atw: Re: Into Linguistic semantics.
- From: Slinka