atw: Re: Great Mate vs Gr8 M8

Niki,

Leaving aside the philosophy, SMS English has a context. In mobile-phone
texting, compactness and economy of character keying are significant
drivers: one is forgiven for using truncated forms when the
communication process (in context) is driven by a need to quickly key in
short messages that can be read in one grab from a very small screen. 

The same does not and cannot apply to instructional and informative
text, where the main driver is to deliver knowledge and understanding.
Such texts simply don't work if the effort of comprehension is foisted
onto the reader.

Admittedly, were Smenglish [your term] constructs to become universal,
then I'd have to say that the language would be valid provided it could
deliver precision and unambiguous meaning. 

  

-----Original Message-----
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nikki Ward
Sent: Tuesday, 15 April 2008 9:38 AM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Nikki Ward; Douglas Jensen; Paul Young; Kirsty.Taylor@xxxxxxxxxx;
Danni.Cunningham@xxxxxxxxxx; kerryr@xxxxxxxxxx; Hamish Blunck
Subject: atw: Great Mate vs Gr8 M8

Hi Everyone!
 

Yesterday as I was trawling through the Macquarie Dictionary, I noticed
a page at the back of the book dedicated to SMS English (I often refer
to it as: Smenglish.. and I got to thinking about why some techwriters
pull up our noses at Smenglish (or do we?) and why?  Consider the
following example:

 

 Great Mate vs Gr8 M8

 

What is the difference between the two and why should one set of symbols
render the other as useless when in fact they are still the same in
pronunciation and meaning and in fact nothing has really changed or has
it? Has the meaning been diminished in any way? 

 

Considering perhaps that these symbols we call words or signifiers carry
with them connotations for example, one is formal and the other isn't,
one carries connotations of 'coolness' (if you are a young person for
example this might be your preferred method of communication). 

 

Could we say that the evolution of Smenglish is related simply to effort
and space on mobile technology?.. Is it here to stay? Should we as
techwriters live in denial or acknowledge its existence but only for
certain contexts?  

What if a techwriter was editing a Smenglish novel designed for mobile
devices or a user manual available on mobile technology...? 
What rules apply?  

 

What is the potential impact on language as we know it?
Does it threaten us because perhaps it may cause a dumbing down? I think
of George Orwell's 1984 where language is limited and so the people
become 'dumbed down' too... 

 

All food for thought... I would be interested in your responses as this
area of language fascinates me .. and I want to see what role it has to
play in techwriting... oh and by the way you don't have to answer all
the questions, just pass on your thoughts.. 

 

Thanks, 

Nikki Ward | Technical Writer

--------------------------------------------

240 Sandgate Rd, Albion, Queensland, 4010, Australia

Tel: 07 3637 1445 | Fax: 07 3262 5742

 

 


########################################################################
##
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: Please consider our environment before printing
this email.This email and any attachments are confidential and may be
subject to copyright, legal or some other professional privilege. They
are intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s).
They may only be copied, distributed or disclosed with the consent of
the copyright owner.
If you have received this email by mistake or by breach of the
confidentiality clause, please notify the sender immediately by return
email and delete or destroy all copies of the email. Any
confidentiality, privilege or copyright is not waived or lost because
this email has been sent to you by mistake. 

########################################################################
##

**************************************************
To view the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter

To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes).

To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION
modes) go to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter

To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be 
read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally 
privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by 
any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any 
unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in 
this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the 
views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately 
delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy 
or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient.
**************************************************
To view the austechwriter archives, go to 
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter

To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes).

To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION modes) go 
to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter

To contact the list administrator, send a message to 
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************

Other related posts: