atw: Re: Friday flame-bait
- From: Stuart Burnfield <sburnf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:26:04 +0800
This might give you some supporting arguments, though I don't suppose it
will change your client's views at all:
AGPS Style Manual for Authors, Editors and Printers - Fifth edition,
1994
Chapter 8 Non-discriminatory language
http://www.agimo.gov.au/__data/assets/file/18828/chp8.pdf
If you have a printed copy of the latest edition, even better.
Stuart Burnfield
> How to explain tactfully to a client that gender-inclusive language
> is not "politically correct", it is ACCURATE and COURTEOUS?
> (One is tempted to quote Dumbledore -- "No, no, these are *manners*.")
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- References:
- atw: Friday flame-bait
- From: fullpwr
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Friday flame-bait
- » atw: Re: Friday flame-bait
- » atw: Re: Friday flame-bait
- atw: Friday flame-bait
- From: fullpwr