atw: Re: Framemaker vs OpenOffice
- From: Stuart Burnfield <sburnf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:27:14 +0800
"Replacing FrameMaker with OpenOffice.org Writer"
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/magazine/technical/replaceframewithwriter.html
Cheers
Stuart
> ... Speaking of Framemaker (which I haven't used since 2000, I think
> it was), I was wondering about opinions on FM vs OpenOffice.
>
> I always thought the advantages of FM were that, first, it was rock
> solid; and second, could handle multi-file documents with ease. But
> I found it more than clunky. (BTW: I've never worked out what it is
> about the look of a doc that says its an FM doc eg. you can tell
> Adobe Acrobat's help was written in FM, but I'm not sure what it is
> about the look that says that.)
>
> Anyway... once OpenOffice settles down, could it replace FM as the
> wordprocessor of choice for large documents?
>
> Garry
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- References:
- atw: Framemaker vs OpenOffice
- From: Gary Stevens
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Framemaker vs OpenOffice
- » atw: Re: Framemaker vs OpenOffice
- » atw: Re: Framemaker vs OpenOffice
- » atw: Re: Framemaker vs OpenOffice
- » atw: Re: Framemaker vs OpenOffice
- atw: Framemaker vs OpenOffice
- From: Gary Stevens