atw: Re: FW: ASTC
- From: Ana Young <ana_young2000@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
I think that the point is being somewhat missed.
Let us see...
1) Is a Vet (or a GP) a good vet (or GP) just because they have a degree? I
most certainly say no.
2) Are there people with no qualifications that can treat animals (or people)
well? I say yes.
3) Would I take my sick animals (or myself) to someone that is not official
recognised as being qualified? Absolutely not.
4) Do I have to pay for the privilege of being seen by a qualified person?
Indeed I do.
--- On Tue, 10/21/08, Christine Kent <c.bkent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Christine Kent <c.bkent@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: atw: FW: ASTC
> To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 7:15 PM
> Forwarded for Geoff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, 22 October 2008 12:51 PM
>
>
> <CK>
> Has a professional association of project managers improved
> the standard of
> project management and the outcome for projects? I say no.
>
> <GP>
> I sort of agree with this one. I work with a lot of PMs
> and they can be
> broken down into three categories:
>
> 1. Members of an organisation (there are several) who are
> good PMs
> 2. Members of an organisation who are bad PMs
> 3. Non-members of an organisation who are bad PMs
>
> While I'm sure there are some, I've never actually
> met a PM who is a
> non-member and is also good.
>
>
> <CK>
> Has the Certificate IV in Workplace Assessment and
> Training, improved the
> quality of training and the outcomes for students. I say
> no.
>
> <GP>
> I agree. I did my Cert IV a few years ago and when I
> finished I realised
> that it gave me a piece of paper but not the ability to be
> a good trainer
> (I can do it, but there are better trainers out there).
>
> <CK>
> The longer we stay outside the system, the better. At the
> moment we don't
> have to have a meaningless qualification or membership of
> an association,
> both of which are so fixated on the process they have
> forgotten the goal.
>
> <GP>
> Probably. I don't see the need for an accreditation
> system, but I've got
> 15 years under my belt, a wide range of experiences on my
> resume, and a
> large portfolio. The *good* PMs I've worked with
> don't give a rats about
> my qualifications - they're only concerned with my
> experience. The bad
> PMs have always commented on my qualifications (draw your
> own
> conclusions).
>
> What I think it comes down to is scenarios.
>
> 1. Worst case of accreditation = no change (there are good
> writers and bad
> writers)
>
> 2. Best case of accreditation = *some* of the worst tech
> writers will be
> forced to leave the industry because they can't get
> much work. And don't
> forget, the organisation needs the budget to have liason
> officers with
> other professional organisations and governments, marketing
> department,
> examinations officers, etc. Expensive.
>
>
> I doubt I'd be prepared to pay the high fees associated
> with such an
> organisation - especially if it wasn't fully recognised
> as the sole
> organisation for TWs on a national level. QLD Tech Writers
> have an
> informal group, NSW seems to very active in many arenas
> (but what
> percentage of NSW working TWs are members?), and Vic is
> still going - what
> about other areas. It is very important that this push
> comes from a broad
> base of TWs in different industries and different
> locations, otherwise it
> will fail to address all the necessary issues.
>
> Well, I hope that raises points for discussion.
>
> Geoff
>
>
> **************************************************
> To view the austechwriter archives, go to
> www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to
> austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
> "unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without
> quotes).
>
> To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and
> VACATION modes) go to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter
>
> To contact the list administrator, send a message to
> austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> **************************************************
**************************************************
To view the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes).
To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION modes) go
to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- atw: Re: FW: ASTC
- From: Janice Gelb
- atw: Re: FW: ASTC
- From: Peter Rule
- References:
- atw: FW: ASTC
- From: Christine Kent
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: FW: ASTC
- » atw: Re: FW: ASTC
- » atw: Re: FW: ASTC
- » atw: Re: FW: ASTC]
- » atw: Re: FW: ASTC
- atw: Re: FW: ASTC
- From: Janice Gelb
- atw: Re: FW: ASTC
- From: Peter Rule
- atw: FW: ASTC
- From: Christine Kent