atw: Re: C++ source code documentation
- From: "Margaret Parker" <margp@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 00:06:54 +1100
Thanks for the replies about this - the comparitive list turned up a few I
hadn't already looked at and Doxygen still comes closest, although it
doesn't do exactly what I want.
Quite frankly I think documenting this stuff is a bit of a waste of time -
but I guess I should be grateful it keeps me gainfully employed...
Thanks again for the responses
Cheers
Margaret
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- References:
- atw: Re: C++ source code documentation
- From: Bridget Knaus
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: C++ source code documentation
- » atw: Re: C++ source code documentation
- » atw: Re: C++ source code documentation
- » atw: Re: C++ source code documentation
- atw: Re: C++ source code documentation
- From: Bridget Knaus