atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- From: "Daryl Colquhoun" <atw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "austechwriter list" <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 07:23:02 +1100
Question 1 - Does anyone know where I can find Australian Standards for the
layout and presentation of letters (correspondence).
Interestingly enough, the German standard relating to this very thing was
for several decades DIN's (German Institute for Standardization)
best-seller. (I learned this by looking at the display at the DIN's
headquarters; I can't find a web reference.) So naturally I thought
Australia would have one. However, enquiries of SAI Global, including a
phone call, suggest that there is no such standard. I suggest that you trawl
their website yourself and ring them, to double-check.
I note Brian's sad comments (quaintly phrased in terms of an obsolete unit
of measure). Still, if want to have a go as browbeating fossilesque
colleagues, you could refer to Australia Post. They don't make standards but
they are explicit on at least how to set out the address; see
http://www.auspost.com.au/BCP/0,1467,CH2092~MO19,00.html.
Emails sent to this address are deleted unread as an anti-spam measure.
**************************************************
To view the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes).
To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION modes) go
to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- From: Christine Kent
- atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- From: Ros Byrne
- atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- From: Brian Clarke
- atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- From: Warren Lewington
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- » atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- From: Christine Kent
- atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- From: Ros Byrne
- atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- From: Brian Clarke
- atw: Re: Australian Standards for Letters
- From: Warren Lewington