atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard.Silcock@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:40:04 +1000
Once again, I'm beginning to regret raising a topic! This time, it's not
because it's led us into a battle between fiercely held points of view,
but instead because it's exposed some of the more ghastly ways people
manage to mangle our language.
Annexure, indeed! I'm sure you're right, Jill, that that word is being
used as you describe, but I think I was happier when no-one had told me
that. Adding a suffix -ure to a verb is normally used to make a noun
describing the process or action of doing something, as in 'legislature'
and 'pressure' from 'legislate' and 'press'. So 'annexure' should mean the
*process* of annexing. (You could call Hitler's action the annexure of
Austria, for example - though 'annexing' would do just as well in this
case.)
Nevertheless, dictionary.com does confirm that "Annexure is a term
substituted in some legal documents for Appendix" (not those lawyers
again!). So once again people have found a way to make our language a bit
more complicated than it needs to be.
I just hope I never have to edit a document that has an annexure. (I might
have a seizure.)
Howard
"Jill Nicholson" <jpnicho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
19/06/2008 10:09 AM
Please respond to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
<austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I thought an appended paper/prewritten doc was called an annexure, and I
believe the word attachment to mean the same.
I also agree with the Kath and Helen definition.
Jill
Jill Nicholson
N&H Communications
2 Park Ave
ROSEVILLE, NSW 2069
61+2+94174302
jpnicho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.nhcommunications.com.au
----- Original Message -----
From: "SUNTER Bede" <Bede_SUNTER@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 3:37 PM
Subject: atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>I agree with Kath and Helen too, but would also like to point out that
> 'annex' is what Germany did to Austria in 1938, and has no place in
> civilised documentation.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tracey
> Colasacco
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 June 2008 2:18 PM
> To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> I agree with Kath and Helen.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Helen Haywood
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 June 2008 1:41 PM
> To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> I agree with Kath. That is exactly my understanding too.
>
> Regards
>
> Helen=A0
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kathy Bowman
> Sent: Wednesday, 18 June 2008 1:38 PM
> To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=3DUNCLASSIFIED]
>
> Hi Howard,
> we use Appendix for additional information or diagrams that would, if
> included in the body of the document, interrupt the flow of the
> document's overall structure; i.e. it is a part of the document.
> An Annex is an external document (with its own title and document id)
> that may be bundled with the main document, but is not part of it.=3D20
> That is my take on the two terms.
> cheers
> Kath
>
>
> **************************************************
> To view the austechwriter archives, go to
> www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx =
> with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes).
>
> To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION =
> modes)
> go to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter
>
> To contact the list administrator, send a message to
> austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> **************************************************
>
> **************************************************
> To view the austechwriter archives, go to
> www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes).
>
> To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION
> modes) go to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter
>
> To contact the list administrator, send a message to
> austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> **************************************************
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.0/1506 - Release Date:
> 6/17/2008 4:30 PM
>
> **************************************************
> To view the austechwriter archives, go to
> www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes).
>
> To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION
> modes) go to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter
>
> To contact the list administrator, send a message to
> austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> **************************************************
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only
> to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may
> contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege
is
> waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not
> responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or
attachment
> to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender,
> and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail
> in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the
> sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if
you
> are not the intended recipient.
> **************************************************
> To view the austechwriter archives, go to
> www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
>
> To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with
> "unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes).
>
> To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION
> modes) go to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter
>
> To contact the list administrator, send a message to
> austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> **************************************************
>
**************************************************
To view the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes).
To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION
modes) go to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
**************************************************
To view the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes).
To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION modes) go
to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Peter Martin
- atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Allan Charlton
- References:
- atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Jill Nicholson
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Peter Martin
- atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Allan Charlton
- atw: Re: Appendixes vs annexes [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Jill Nicholson