atw: Re: Agencies, contractors and other gripes (another longish contribution)

Guys - you going to get bogged down again through lack of clear thinking.

First - there are TWO issues on the agenda which should be kept quite
distinct and separate.

1       Document and communicate the "what is".  This is the easy bit.  It
should bring quick reward, and be an essential starting point to looking
into accreditation anyway.
2       Set up a system of accreditation

Second - you will do nothing if you start to get bogged down in who should
run this.  

As far as who is involved is concerned - let volunteers get on with it.
Michelle seems keen, so please let her get on with it. Or two people,
Michelle could run the document what is stage, and Warren could run the
accreditation stage.   If some of those who volunteer are also involved with
one, two or a zillion associations, let them volunteer like everyone else,
and add value where they can.  Who wants to set an agenda, book a room,
organise a hook-up of some kind, book the date and invite everyone else?
Then do it.  That's it.  Not complicated.

ck.



-----Original Message-----
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bruce Ashley
Sent: Wednesday, 17 January 2007 2:07 PM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Re: Agencies, contractors and other gripes (another longish
contribution)

I'm not knocking either society Michael. I have been on three previous
committees with the ASTC(Vic) (although the last one didn't last very long)
so I'm familiar with a lot that goes on in the background.
All I was saying is that accreditation should be ASTC led.
But having said that, I haven't seen the code of ethics either. :)

Cheers,
Bruce

-----Original Message-----
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Michael Lewis
Sent: Wednesday, 17 January 2007 1:24 PM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Re: Agencies, contractors and other gripes (another longish
contribution)

Bruce Ashley:

> As our 'representative' bodies, both ASTCs should not only be involved,
but
> should be driving this (they have tinkered with it many times in the
past).
> In theory, the TW community appoints the committee members of both
societies
> to act on their behalf so why (in theory) would we need to go outside the
> societies?

Perhaps it's worth remembering that -- in NSW, at least -- the ASTC was
successful in getting a Code of Ethics defined and agreed. Whether it has
made
any perceptible difference to the lives of technical communicators is
something I can't begin to guess. But it was a fairly tough problem that
many
thought was not solvable.


Michael Lewis

--------------------------------------
Brandle Pty Limited, Sydney, Australia
www.brandle.com.au
--------------------------------------


**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.

To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.

To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter

To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************

**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.

To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.

To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter

To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.13/632 - Release Date: 16/01/2007
4:36 PM
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.13/632 - Release Date: 16/01/2007
4:36 PM
 

**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to 
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to 
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.

To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.

To search the austechwriter archives, go to 
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter

To contact the list administrator, send a message to 
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************

Other related posts: