atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
- From: "Hallett, Michelle" <Michelle.Hallett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:15:10 +1100
Janice,
We can make an attempt to act as a group and get things to work for us or we
can be negative about this and assume it will never happen because writers
aren't herd animals.
As long as I have the time, I prefer to try, naïve as that may seem.
Regards
Michelle
-----Original Message-----
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Janice Gelb
Sent: Monday, 22 January 2007 11:07 AM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
Hallett, Michelle wrote:
>
> Rules and payrates, we can leave these to be decided by employers and
> agencies or we can attempt to influence them by deciding what rules and
> payrates we individually would like and attempting to stick to them. For
> example, I understand most people are asking for $65-70 an hour. If we
> all refuse to accept anything lower than $60, then employers and
> agencies will have to pay that or accept someone with lesser skills. If
> there are lots of jobs, prospective employees are less desperate and
> more likely to hold out for better pay and prospective employers become
> more desperate. Now we currently have a situation of low unemployment,
> so we can use it to help influence the rules. When unemployment rises,
> with any luck we will stabilise at a higher payrate and employers will
> be budgeting for this higher rate. Marketing students know this as
> supply and demand plus there's an inertia to the market which is
> actually predicted by chaos theory (strange attractors).
>
Sorry to rain on your parade but this seems incredibly
naive to me despite the economic jargon. Writers do
not tend to be herd animals :-> so the odds of them
banding together to even agree on a minimum wage let
alone not taking jobs unless such a wage is guaranteed
are minimal at best. And on the other side, employers
who solely hire contractors do not all care so much
about quality that they wouldn't be willing to hire
someone cheaper with less experience. I think that
individual people secure in their skills and experience
can insist on a certain wage but as a pack I don't think
it's likely.
-- Janice
*****************************************************************************
This email, and any files transmitted with it, are confidential and intended
for use by the addressee only. The confidential nature of the information
contained in the email and/or file attachment is not waived, lost or destroyed
if it is sent to other than the addressee. Use or dissemination of the
information contained in the email and/or file attachment, by a recipient other
than the addressee, may cause commercial damage to both/either the sender
and/or addressee. If you are not the addressee of this email/file attachment
contact the sender immediately and delete this email/file attachment.
All email communications to and from this company are filtered and stored for
risk management purposes in accordance with our Computer and Email Policies.
Please contact our Privacy Manager on (02) 8668 6947 if you would like further
information about our Policies in regard to these issues.
*****************************************************************************
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
- From: Janice Gelb
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
- » atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
- » atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
- » atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
- » atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
- » atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
- » atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
- » atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
- » atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
- » atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
- » atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
- » atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
- atw: Re: Accreditation...but long before that?
- From: Janice Gelb