[atlantaprog] Re: why prog faces an uphill battle
- From: UncleEggsy@xxxxxxx
- To: atlantaprog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:03:14 EST
Just for contrast, here's a review that I wrote for Room On Fire that I've
posted a few places:
In early April of 1966 The Beatles entered Abbey Road and began recording a
track with the working title of "Mark One" for their as yet untitled new album.
Just about four brisk months to the day later Revolver was released and is
still regarded by many as the high water mark in the history of contemporary
popular music. To look at the sea of magazine covers on which The Strokes are
currently splashed and to read the over the top hype spewed by an oft near
hysterical rock press, you'd think that Revolver's high water mark had finally
been
met and, yes, eclipsed after all these years. Unfortunately, their new album,
Room On Fire, tells us a bit more about the sad state of disrepair into which
modern rock music has fallen than it does about scaling the glorious heights
that rock once inhabited. Times are tough indeed when this group is looked to
for salvation.
The first thing I noticed about Room On Fire is that it's the tinniest, most
thin and monophonic sounding CD I've heard since St. friggin' Anger. This
thing could practically be an AM radio broadcast and suffer no appreciable
decline
in sonic detail. The second thing I noticed is that, even though the band,
apparently, has a living, breathing drummer, all of the drum tracks sound like
the cheapest drum machine off the rack from Guitar Center playing the sort of
plodding "thud thud thud thud" beat, repeated ad nauseum for the whole of just
about every track, that guitarists program as a rhythm loop when they just
feel like practicing a bit or recording a demo on a 4-track.
Cool ironic detachment might be one thing, but Julian Casablancas sings in
such a flat and unemotional "five packs of cigarettes a day" monotone that
you'd
think that he's just so phenomenally bored to even be alive. As for the
songs, the album is pretty much the same retread of Lou Reed, Television and
Iggy
Pop as their first album, except for the single, "12:51," which sounds very
much like The Cars with colds.
Oh, and it, apparently, took The Strokes over a year and a half just to pull
this 33 minute (actually a few minutes*shorter* than Revolver) thing together.
How sad is that? The room might be burning, but The Strokes are blowing soggy
woodchips and newspaper at a campsite somewhere near the bottom of a mountain
that they have neither the talent nor charisma to scale.
CH
Other related posts: