[atlantaprog] why prog faces an uphill battle
- From: "Brian King" <lordonly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <atlantaprog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 06:30:57 -0500
Check out this Strokes review from the AJC. So critics appreciate "brevity and
efficiency", eh? Sounds like a charitable way of admitting you have a short
attention span and/or limited intellect... limited enough to be a professional
writer and not know the proper usage of "us" vs. "we". But, but-- Every tune
could be a single! How precious.
Brian
LO
Strokes' 'Room' hot place to visit
By NICK MARINO
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
David Lee Roth once famously said that rock critics like Elvis Costello because
rock critics look like Elvis Costello, which may be partially true. Most rock
critics do not look like the Strokes -- we wish! -- but we do think like the
Strokes. We appreciate urgency and brevity. We like a swinging rhythm section.
If we were in hot young New York City bands, we too would sound like the Velvet
Underground.
For these reasons and many more, the new Strokes record, "Room on Fire," is
sure to collect rave after slobbering rave. And while it would be nice to be a
contrarian -- us critics love contrariness, dontcha know -- and say that the
pretty boys can't play, can't write or can't sing, they can actually do all of
the above with effortless style. They deserve the hype.
Their new disc has no bad songs, an improvement from 2001's "Is This It," which
had one bad song. The Strokes remain big advocates of quality control, keeping
every "Room" song under four minutes and the entire album just over a
half-hour. It's swift and efficient, like a guillotine, over before you know
it. Every tune could be a single. Every melody could break a barmaid's heart.
The year may yield better records, but it won't give us anything else this
immediate.
Other related posts: