[atlantaprog] Re: prog
- From: Brain21 <brain21@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: atlantaprog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 15:29:54 -0500
Allen Welty-Green wrote:
Their brilliance was they way they were able to take these very
conservative constraints and create works of lasting beauty and
integrity, but seldom would one of them try and break out of those
rules and conventions. Emerson's compositional brilliance came from
the fact that he was working within a different set of rules and
Actually, not true. In terms of pure theory, most of the great
composers went outside of the strict set of rules. Many of them ignored
key signatures and used "outside" notes all the time. THeir brilliance
is that when playing or listening to their music you can't tell which
notes are "inside" and which are "out" - a testament to the way that
they used these creatively in order to fit and enhance the melody, etc.
In terms of subject matter, Mozart was EXTREMELY controversial, lewd,
you name it! Always breaking the traditions and shocking people.
Franz Liszt even had many groupies, and was the first "rock star" type
of musical personality.
Alex F/Brain21
- References:
- [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- From: Allen Welty-Green
Other related posts:
- » [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- » [atlantaprog] prog
- » [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- » [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- » [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- » [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- » [atlantaprog] prog
- » [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- » [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- » [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- » [atlantaprog] prog
- » [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- » [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- » [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- » [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- » [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- » [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- » [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- [atlantaprog] Re: prog
- From: Allen Welty-Green