[atlantaprog] Re: informal PC poll, and Cake/Cheap Trick
- From: "Ken MacLeish" <kmacleish@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <atlantaprog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 20:29:41 -0400
I use 1280x1024, but as a truly demented geek I have a fairly large monitor
because I use it constantly. I would agree that 800x600 is a good target
resolution.
I also agree with the comment about the background on your Web pages - it
definitely does more harm than good by being pretty "busy".
(Cool pictures from the outdoor show, BTW . . . . )
At 04:28 PM 8/21/2003 +0000, you wrote:
>Hey all,
>
>I'm planning to tweak my website soon, I was wondering what some of your
>monitor resolutions were set to? Word has it that the average internet
>viewer sees things through a setting of 1024 X 768. Mine is set at 800 X
>600, and the higher setting makes things incredibly tiny for me. My
>website is at www.painespromise.com if you care to make any comments as to
>how it looks now before I make some changes. It looks size-appropriate to
>me at my setting, and I'm wondering if the rest of the world sees things
>differently (?)
>
>BTW, anyone going to Cake and Cheap Trick Sept. 2 at the Tabernacle? - VH
- Follow-Ups:
- [atlantaprog] thanks for the PC poll answers
- From: Veronica Hughes
- References:
- [atlantaprog] Re: informal PC poll, and Cake/Cheap Trick
- From: George Menhorn
Other related posts:
- » [atlantaprog] informal PC poll, and Cake/Cheap Trick
- » [atlantaprog] Re: informal PC poll, and Cake/Cheap Trick
- » [atlantaprog] Re: informal PC poll, and Cake/Cheap Trick
- » [atlantaprog] Re: informal PC poll, and Cake/Cheap Trick
- » [atlantaprog] Re: informal PC poll, and Cake/Cheap Trick
- [atlantaprog] thanks for the PC poll answers
- From: Veronica Hughes
- [atlantaprog] Re: informal PC poll, and Cake/Cheap Trick
- From: George Menhorn