[atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- From: "Brian King" <lordonly@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <atlantaprog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 14:16:09 -0500
From: "Jeff Blanks" <jblanks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Brian King pointed out:
>
>
>http://www.prorec.com/prorec/articles.nsf/articles/8A133F52D0FD71AB86256C2E
005D
> >AF1C
>
> I've seen it, thanks, and really, I know what he's talking about. But I
> can't help but think this is another instance of confusing technical flaws
> with esthetics. Maybe some people just don't like the production--I don't
> know.
Perhaps. It would only be an esthetic decision if the band and/or engineers
_intended_ to squash the dynamics down to almost nothing and introduce >100
sheared-off transients into the mix, but maybe they did. It was only a few
decades ago that distorted guitar was considered desirable, after all. When
we were having our cd mastered the engineer (Jay Frigoletto, ex-Atlantan now
in LA, who I'd HIGHLY recommend to anyone) made different versions for us to
consider, one through old analog equipment (Tektronics, Drawmer, Urei, etc),
and a couple of Sonic Solutions versions with different degrees of peak
limiting. The more extreme one was very fatiguing-- louder but with less
punch-- and even it was nowhere close to what they did with Vapor Trails.
Brian
- Follow-Ups:
- [atlantaprog] different standards
- From: Veronica Hughes
- References:
- [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- From: Allen Welty-Green
- [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- From: Jeff Blanks
- [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- From: Jeff Blanks
Other related posts:
- » [atlantaprog] another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- » [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- [atlantaprog] different standards
- From: Veronica Hughes
- [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- From: Allen Welty-Green
- [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- From: Jeff Blanks
- [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- From: Jeff Blanks