[atlantaprog] Why music really is getting louder

From The Times
June 4, 2007
Why music really is getting louder Adam Sherwin, Media Correspondent

Dad was right all along – rock music really is getting louder and now
recording experts have warned that the sound of chart-topping albums is
making listeners feel sick.

That distortion effect running through your Oasis album is not entirely the
Gallagher brothers' invention. Record companies are using digital technology
to turn the volume on CDs up to "11".

Artists and record bosses believe that the best album is the loudest one.
Sound levels are being artificially enhanced so that the music punches
through when it competes against background noise in pubs or cars.

Britain's leading studio engineers are starting a campaign against a
widespread technique that removes the dynamic range of a recording, making
everything sound "loud".
Related Links

  - Beyoncé
  
<http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/live_reviews/article1878431.ece>


  - On a wing and a prayer
  
<http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article1861510.ece>


  - The great pretenders
  
<http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article1861516.ece>

"Peak limiting" squeezes the sound range to one level, removing the peaks
and troughs that would normally separate a quieter verse from a pumping
chorus.

The process takes place at mastering, the final stage before a track is
prepared for release. In the days of vinyl, the needle would jump out of the
groove if a track was too loud.

But today musical details, including vocals and snare drums, are lost in the
blare and many CD players respond to the frequency challenge by adding a
buzzing, distorted sound to tracks.

Oasis started the loudness war and recent albums by Arctic Monkeys and Lily
Allen have pushed the loudness needle further into the red.

The Red Hot Chili Peppers' Californication, branded "unlistenable" by studio
experts, is the subject of an online petition calling for it to be
"remastered" without its harsh, compressed sound.

Peter Mew, senior mastering engineer at Abbey Road studios, said: "Record
companies are competing in an arms race to make their album sound the
'loudest'. The quieter parts are becoming louder and the loudest parts are
just becoming a buzz."

Mr Mew, who joined Abbey Road in 1965 and mastered David Bowie's classic
1970s albums, warned that modern albums now induced nausea.

He said: "The brain is not geared to accept buzzing. The CDs induce a sense
of fatigue in the listeners. It becomes psychologically tiring and almost
impossible to listen to. This could be the reason why CD sales are in a
slump."

Geoff Emerick, engineer on the Beatles' Sgt. Pepper album, said: "A lot of
what is released today is basically a scrunched-up mess. Whole layers of
sound are missing. It is because record companies don't trust the listener
to decide themselves if they want to turn the volume up."

Downloading has exacerbated the effect. Songs are compressed once again into
digital files before being sold on iTunes and similar sites. The reduction
in quality is so marked that EMI has introduced higher-quality digital
tracks, albeit at a premium price, in response to consumer demand.

Domino, Arctic Monkeys' record company, defended its band's use of
compression on their chart-topping albums, as a way of making their music
sound "impactful".

Angelo Montrone, an executive at One Haven, a Sony Music company, said the
technique was "causing our listeners fatigue and even pain while trying to
enjoy their favourite music".

In an open letter to the music industry, he asked: "Have you ever heard one
of those test tones on TV when the station is off the air? Notice how it
becomes painfully annoying in a very short time? That's essentially what you
do to a song when you super-compress it. You eliminate all dynamics."

Mr Montrone released a compression-free album by Texan roots rock group Los
Lonely Boys which sold 2.5 million copies.

Val Weedon, of the UK Noise Association, called for a ceasefire in the
"loudness war". She said: "Bass-heavy music is already one of the biggest
concerns for suffering neighbours. It is one thing for music to be loud but
to make it deliberately noisy seems pointless."

Mr Emerick, who has rerecorded Sgt. Pepper on the original studio equipment
with contemporary artists, admitted that bands have always had to fight to
get their artistic vision across.

He said: "The Beatles didn't want any nuance altered on Sgt. Pepper. I had a
stand-up row with the mastering engineer because I insisted on sitting in on
the final transfer."

The Beatles lobbied Parlophone, their record company, to get their records
pressed on thicker vinyl so they could achieve a bigger bass sound.

Bob Dylan has joined the campaign for a return to musical dynamics. He told
Rolling Stone magazine: "You listen to these modern records, they're
atrocious, they have sound all over them. There's no definition of nothing,
no vocal, no nothing, just like – static."

*Studio sound*

— The human ear responds to the average sound across a piece of music rather
than peaks and crescendos. Quiet and loud sounds are squashed together,
decreasing the dynamic range, raising the average loudness

— The saturation level for a sound signal is digital full scale, or 0dB. In
the 1980s, the average sound level of a track was -18dB. The arrival of
digital technology allowed engineers to push finished tracks closer to the
loudest possible, 0dB

— The curves of a sound wave, which represent a wide dynamic range, become
clipped and flattened to create "square waves" which generate a buzzing
effect and digital distortion on CD players

  - Have your 
say<http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/music/article1878724.ece#comments-form>


  - Have your say <#comments-form>

As other readers have pointed out, it's been going on for some time. A lot
of older (vinyl) records have far better sound quality than today's
pressings - with quieter levels of background noise and greater dynamic
swings. CD's have a whole list of vices - they don't need more - and I won't
even mention MP3's. High levels of compression are not necessary with good
equipment. The recording engineers need to stop catering for the lowest
common denominator (the commuter in the car) - the radio stations add their
own compression anyway - and use compression judiciously.

i Morris, St Jean de Luz, Pays Basque

The phrase is "Retroactive".

We are seeing a polarisation, between 'quality', refined listeners, and
people who just want to burn their eardrums out. This kind of thing will
always sell. Thing...

Paul Wady, London, Britain

It certainly ought to be an offence for drivers to play music so loudly it
can be heard outside their vehicle.

Barry, Wallington, UK

Other related posts: