[atlantaprog] Vapor Trails
- From: Veronica Hughes <upkat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: atlantaprog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 14:39:11
Hear hear!!!! I agree. The 80's Rush sound was just not very good, Vapor
Trails is a huge improvement in comparison.
At 09:49 PM 08/15/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>Paul Cashman wrote:
>
>>Allen Welty-Green wrote:
>
>>> Sometimes modern recording techniques compress and process the very
>>> life out of the music.
>>
>>That would be "what is Rush's VAPOUR TRAILS?" for $400, Alex....
>
>? I think that's a fine, very "alive"-sounding record. There's a bit of
>trashiness to it, but I can live with it. It's certainly the very opposite
>production-wise of an album like *Hold Your Fire*.
>
>
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [atlantaprog] Re: Vapor Trails
- From: Simon Jester
- References:
- [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- From: Paul W. Cashman
- [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- From: Allen Welty-Green
- [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- From: Jeff Blanks
Other related posts:
- » [atlantaprog] Vapor Trails
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Vapor Trails
- [atlantaprog] Re: Vapor Trails
- From: Simon Jester
- [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- From: Paul W. Cashman
- [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- From: Allen Welty-Green
- [atlantaprog] Re: another aspect
- From: Jeff Blanks