[atlantaprog] Re: Radiohead once again changing the rules...
- From: James Combs <jwcombs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: atlantaprog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 20:34:17 -0400
I worked for CBS Records from 1978-1983 and what my friends who are
still in the business tell me, the late '80s and '90s saw the rise of
lawyers and accountants running labels. That move away from people
with ears to people with spreadsheets is blamed for the current
malaise that permeates the industry today. The music business was
much more a balance of music and business back then, and
unfortunately music took the brunt of the reform just before the turn
of the century.
So major labels decided it was not financially viable to support the
development of new music or any music outside of what was saleable.
And for independent artists or developing artists, it means the
labels are there to capitalize on your hard work and investment.
Which is not necessarily a "bad thing" but it is definitely a
commercial thing.
--
Jim Combs
Buy my new Sensitive Chaos "Leak" CD at http://cdbaby.com/sensitivechaos
Atlanta's Creative Loafing Best of 2007 "Best Local Electronic Act"
"I highly recommend Leak for its inventiveness, its beat-happy
effervescence, and its thorough lack of pretension, not to mention
it’s just a flat out fun album from start to finish." - Bill
Binkelman, New Age Reporter
www.myspace.com/jimcombs
www.sensitivechaos.com
www.myspace.com/sensitivechaos
On Oct 2, 2007, at 5:37 PM, Wade S wrote:
I think it's pretty cool that Radiohead is doing this. It gets
them in the news, it gets the music out to people, It's got all of
us talking about their new album and before this thread, I didn't
know there was one. Good job!
However, there's been a bit of talk about how it's good because
it's anti major label in some ways. "Major Label = Bad" is an idea
that I hear a lot about. It seems like there's been a lot of
negativity towards the major labels since around 1991 / Nirvana.
Why is that? What do you guys think is wrong with the major
labels? Just curious.
-Wade
_________________________________________________________________
More photos; more messages; more storage—get 5GB with Windows Live
Hotmail. http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-
us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_2G_0507
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [atlantaprog] Radiohead once again changing the rules...
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Radiohead once again changing the rules...
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Radiohead once again changing the rules...
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Radiohead once again changing the rules...
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Radiohead once again changing the rules...
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Radiohead once again changing the rules...
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Radiohead once again changing the rules...
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Radiohead once again changing the rules...
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Radiohead once again changing the rules...
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Radiohead once again changing the rules...
However, there's been a bit of talk about how it's good because it's anti major label in some ways. "Major Label = Bad" is an idea that I hear a lot about. It seems like there's been a lot of negativity towards the major labels since around 1991 / Nirvana. Why is that? What do you guys think is wrong with the major labels? Just curious.
-Wade _________________________________________________________________More photos; more messages; more storage—get 5GB with Windows Live Hotmail. http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en- us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_2G_0507