Other than suing it its clients (as young as 12 years old) and historically robbing the artists because they had a stranglehold on distribution... nothing. I love that the distribution is now in the marketplace. like myspace and other internet places will show the cream (whatevr that means, prettiest, baddest assed, best musically) etc will filter through the masses. At least WE get to decide what WE like, not some record exec pushing out stacks to get a local DJ to play the most recent JLO single until it is so carved in y brain I kinda like it. On 10/2/07, Wade S <cobwebstrange@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think it's pretty cool that Radiohead is doing this. It gets them in > the > news, it gets the music out to people, It's got all of us talking about > their new album and before this thread, I didn't know there was one. Good > job! > > However, there's been a bit of talk about how it's good because it's anti > major label in some ways. "Major Label = Bad" is an idea that I hear a > lot > about. It seems like there's been a lot of negativity towards the major > labels since around 1991 / Nirvana. Why is that? What do you guys think > is wrong with the major labels? Just curious. > > -Wade > > _________________________________________________________________ > More photos; more messages; more storage—get 5GB with Windows Live > Hotmail. > > http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_2G_0507 > > >