[atlantaprog] Re: More about music & the internet (Wilco)
- From: BK Broyla <bkbroyla@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: atlantaprog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:48:01 -0800 (PST)
Something to keep in mind: Leaving aside the impact on labels, if one artist
is helped by filesharing and another is hurt, which are you more likely to hear
about? The first guy is selling more records, playing bigger/more shows,
getting awards and press, while the latter is living an even more marginal
existence than before, a foot on the banana peel toward working at Starbucks
again. I think FS can be good or bad for artists, depending on their music
style and the fan behavior patterns within that scene (it's probably good for
jam-bands, bad for one-hit-wonder top 40 types). I also think it speaks
volumes that Wilco jumped right back on the major-label bandwagon when they had
the chance. Must be some reason.
My hat's off to Wilco or Umphrey's McGee, or anyone savvy enough to leverage
conditions to their advantage and keep the fans happy. Yes, they 'get it' from
the standpoint of figuring out how to make things work for them and their fans,
and that's great. The only problem I have is when someone says that because
something works for them and they like it, that EVERYONE must do the same.
Metallica's noise-making about this got tiresome a long time ago, and I think
they're shooting themselves in the foot with bad PR, regardless of the merits
of their argument-- but what gives Tweedy the right to dictate how much money
someone else should make?
I appreciate the idea that the listener is a participant in the live concert
and in the larger fan/artist relationship, but how does that relate to
filesharing? If people are buying cds and downloading live shows and
promotional giveaways with the band's approval, great; if they're just grabbing
the two tracks they like off a greatest hits cd in lieu of buying the album,
that stinks. The listener is NOT a participant/collaborator in the studio,
certainly. These are two distinct behaviors with different outcomes and
effects on each artist.
How does disallowing sampling without a license equate to racism, exactly?
Counterproductive and not totally reasonable, but racist?
Brian
Allen Welty-Green <agmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Wilco seems to "get it" -
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.02/view.html?pg=5
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
- Follow-Ups:
- [atlantaprog] Re: More about music & the internet (Wilco)
- From: Allen Welty-Green
- References:
- [atlantaprog] More about music & the internet (Wilco)
- From: Allen Welty-Green
Other related posts:
- » [atlantaprog] More about music & the internet (Wilco)
- » [atlantaprog] Re: More about music & the internet (Wilco)
- » [atlantaprog] Re: More about music & the internet (Wilco)
- » [atlantaprog] Re: More about music & the internet (Wilco)
- » [atlantaprog] Re: More about music & the internet (Wilco)
- » [atlantaprog] Re: More about music & the internet (Wilco)
- » [atlantaprog] Re: More about music & the internet (Wilco)
- » [atlantaprog] Re: More about music & the internet (Wilco)
- » [atlantaprog] Re: More about music & the internet (Wilco)
- » [atlantaprog] Re: More about music & the internet (Wilco)
- [atlantaprog] Re: More about music & the internet (Wilco)
- From: Allen Welty-Green
- [atlantaprog] More about music & the internet (Wilco)
- From: Allen Welty-Green