[atlantaprog] Re: John Turner Overdrive

Ken, 

I'm not "privy" to LO's "inner workings" and I got it right off the bat!  I 
think more 'got it' than would admit to it though! ;) lol

Beth


> 
> From: <kmacleish@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 2005/03/29 Tue PM 03:44:09 EST
> To: <atlantaprog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [atlantaprog] Re: John Turner Overdrive
> 
> OK, wait a minute here.
> 
> Unless I missed something (always a distinct possibility with advancing 
> years), John's post made no mention of anything or anybody specific to Lord 
> Only. If issues that he touched on DID in fact relate to situations within 
> the band, only the Lord Only members would know. I just read it as his take 
> on the band-leadership thing. If he was in fact trashing former bandmates, 
> only those privy to Lord Only's inner workings would have had a clue.
> 
> --Ken
> > 
> > From: <princesssalmacis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: 2005/03/29 Tue PM 08:31:15 GMT
> > To: <atlantaprog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [atlantaprog] Re: John Turner Overdrive
> > 
> > AWG,
> > 
> > Why would it take you this long to come down on it? Why NOW? You shouldv'e 
> > said something about it to John....not wait for Brian's post.  Fair is 
> > fair.....just because some might not have known what all John was 
> > attempting to get at (which btw was all pathetic & juvenile) doesn't mean 
> > that someone else shouldn't let others know what was going on.  I do 
> > believe most realized it anyway...but as it goes, John was the one that 
> > brought it all up....not ANY other LO member or ex-member.
> > 
> > just my $.02 worth.
> > 
> > PEACE
> > Beth
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 

"Challenges are what makes this life interesting. Overcoming them is what makes 
life meaningful."~Unknown

Other related posts: