[atlantaprog] Re: Fwd: Tape Op issue 65
- From: Andrew Tegethoff <ategethoff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <atlantaprog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 14:29:57 -0400
Booyah, granny! I pretty much agree with this rant 100%. Yet my ultimate
reaction to this is, "Yeah? So what?"
You see, I view the homogenization of modern pop/rock/r&b/hip-hop music as a
SYMPTOM, not a cause. Things got to be this way because the record industry
got bought up by large corporations. Then the broadcasting industry got
deregulated, went corporate, and consolidated. With large corporations the
driving force is profit/shareholder value. So the product -- the music part of
it -- necessarily gets commoditized. That's how companies do business -- they
try to manufacture their products with as little overhead as possible. Let's
be honest, though: there's always been a certain measure of that in pop/rock.
It's "the star-maker machinery behind the popular song". But the advent of
modern digital and specifically computer-based recording only makes Joni's
metaphor more pointed. Increasingly, producers can establish any musical mold
they want and stick the hottest bimbos (male or female) available into it.
Which is much cheaper than actually investing in a long-term career for a
talented, temperamental, EXPENSIVE legitimate artist.
On top of this, and related directly to the author's position, there is a trend
on the technical side of the music industry to bandwagon to the newest gear.
There is always new gear to A-B, minutiae of specs to analyze, talk about who's
using what piece, where, on what record. I think it's hard to really quantify
or qualify the gains we've seen in the last 20-30 years in terms of advances in
audio gear. Ultimately, while many audio production tasks have gotten easier
and/or cheaper, we've paid for it in sound quality. Couple this gear slutting
with extreme pressure from the people paying their bills and you can see why
audio pros end up knuckling under, producing crap just like the author admits
to.
I think those two trends have combined into a mainstream river of crapola. You
have least common denominator artists being produced and recorded, effectively,
by a whole profession largely filled with lemmings. Not a good recipe for
quality art, IMO.
I am not curmudgeonly about new music -- there is plenty of good new music out
there, and more comes out daily. But I strongly believe that, while even 15
years ago there was still regular intersection possible between "good" music
and "massively popular" music, these days those intersections are few and far
between. Mainstream popular music is almost universally dismal in terms of
writing, performance, production, marketing, etc. You have to go
significantly far off the reservation sometimes to find new music that's worth
a crap.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------> >
From: Allen Welty-Green <agmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Subject: [atlantaprog] Fwd:
Tape Op issue 65> Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 10:35:23 -0400> > For your reading and
discussion pleasure:> > http://www.tapeop.com/tapeoptemp/TapeOp65Page90.pdf> >
> ------------------------------> > End of atlantaprog Digest V5 #64>
********************************>
_________________________________________________________________
Keep your kids safer online with Windows Live Family Safety.
http://www.windowslive.com/family_safety/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Refresh_family_safety_052008
Other related posts: