[atlantaprog] Fwd: [ARTNEWS] death of the album?
- From: Allen Welty-Green <agmedia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: atlantaprog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:53:27 -0500
from The Globe and Mail
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/
20040220/ALBUM20/
Death of the album?
Digital music, bonus content and labels' desire for lower costs are
causing the traditional music format to change faster than the music it
holds,
By GUY DIXON
Friday, February 20, 2004 - Page R5
'Albums are overrated, maybe the music industry is just figuring that
out."
It seemed like a casual remark at the time, but an apt one. The New
York Times pop critic Kelefa Sanneh said it at the start off a recent
audio review on the paper's website, making the point that rapper Missy
Elliott's albums sound "more like mix tapes. There's no real theme or
storyline, just a whole bunch of beats and jokes and hooks."
But something in Sanneh's voice suggested that maybe the whole notion
of albums has become a little overrated these day. It could have been
one of those declarative statements that music writers make and then
take back in different contexts. But what may be surprising is how many
people seem to agree.
Thirty years ago, at the apex of the concept-album era, calling albums
overrated would have sounded hopelessly disparaging. It was assumed
then that albums made for art, coming after years of pivotal releases
from Beatles' Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band to Marvin Gaye's
What's Going On to Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon, to say nothing
of predecessors such as Miles Davis's definitive exercise in modal jazz
Kind of Blue and John Coltrane's meditative A Love Supreme. For a
critic to have called albums overrated would have been prime bait for
ridicule.
Now it seems to be the new orthodoxy. When listing its choice for the
number one album of the 1990s, the influential music web site
Pitchforkmedia.com led by saying, "The end of the nineties will be seen
as the end of the album. The rise of MP3 technology and file
downloading returned pop music consumption to [a] collective
pre-Beatles mindset, where songs are judged as singles." This was meant
as praise for Radiohead's OK Computer, as if describing that record as
the passing of an era.
To say the least, the idea of what constitutes a proper album is
unravelling, and the artists, as always, are causing a lot of that
change themselves. Missy Elliott is only among the latest to push and
pull, elevate and trash the album format. The rap duo OutKast succeeded
by going the grandiose route, expanding their latest album
Speakerboxxx/The Love Below into a double CD and splitting the two
rappers' individual styles into separate discs. They managed the nearly
impossible: high praise, high sales and a closing spot on the latest
Grammy Awards with their win for best album of the year.
Soul-rap singer Erykah Badu, meanwhile, is among those who
intentionally demur. From the start, she described her latest album,
Worldwide Underground, as merely an EP, even though it contains 50
minutes of music, more than many full-length R&B albums. It was a
belittling move, as if to label her latest effort as not being a true
follow-up to 2000's Mamma's Gun. She confused matters, though, by
suggesting to Billboard magazine that she viewed the disc as a unified,
album-length statement: "I want people to listen from beginning to end
-- to feel the whole movement." In the end, Worldwide Underground
received a Grammy nomination for best R&B album. Luther Vandross's
Dance With My Father wound up winning.
All of this is of course occurring at a time when the industry holds
nothing sacrosanct. Week after week, the idea of the album as an
integral, whole unit is flying out the window as new ways are pushed to
buy songs off the Internet individually and new incarnations of digital
technology, such as Apple's iPods, keep coming on the market, allowing
users to store thousands of songs in one's palm.
Is the CD album -- in its unpleasantly clattering case, capable of
holding 75-plus minutes of pure brilliance -- still the highest state
for recorded music? It seems impossible to imagine people thinking of
their record collections as mere data waiting to be transferred onto
their computer hard drives. But is that the idea?
Some of Sony Music's top U.S. executives raised more questions than
they answered by reportedly suggesting late last year that the tendency
to overfill CDs with music, simply because CD technology allows more
music per disc than old LPs could hold, has meant more filler that
listeners don't want.
It's a common complaint, especially among filesharers who say that
having to pay for filler is a justification for downloading music for
free. Who really wants deliberate filler? (Actually, I don't mind. I
like the glimpses into the creative process and marketing decisions
that lesser songs on a record provide. But that's another story.) The
comments attributed to Sony also imply an interest by record executives
in cutting costs, possibly making shorter, stripped-down albums which
could conceivably become more like a collection of prospective hits
geared to iPods rather than longer, artistic statements meant to be
heard in their entirety.
The head of another major recording giant, however, envisions albums
going in the opposite direction by carrying more -- particularly more
video content such as documentaries and concert footage. Not
surprisingly, his company is among those aggressively pushing into
music-video DVDs. "The physical product five years down the road won't
be the CD as we know it," he said candidly during a visit to Toronto.
Yet, there's an irony in Sony's comments, since it is the parent
company of Columbia Records, the originator back in the late 1940s of
the 331/3 LP and, in many ways, the album format as we know it.
Of course calling albums the highest artistic statement for recorded
music inevitably runs into myriad contradictions. Miles Davis's seminal
statement for the cool jazz movement, Birth of Cool, was initially
issued as separate singles. Early Beatles albums in North America were
truncated versions of the original British LPs and the later CD
reissues. But for those who grew up with the warmer, folkier U.S. LP
configuration of Rubber Soul with I've Just Seen a Face as the first
track, can the CD version leading off with Drive My Car ever sound
right?
Then there's the Who's Tommy -- so self-consciously conceptual that the
band's subsequent Who's Next, a hodge-podge of songs from Pete
Townshend's ambitious and ultimately aborted
concept-to-end-all-concepts, the Lifehouse project, is now more
commonly held as the better of the two.
But perhaps no group mustered the ethos of album-as-paramount-statement
quite like early Chicago, long before the group devolved into the power
balladry of bassist Peter Cetera. Today, the group's pianist and singer
Robert Lamm, who is still with the band, seems to disparage the passing
of the album era.
"We always were at odds with the record company for doing any edits at
all, ever. We had really vicious discussions with the record company
and with our management. And of course our management was used to
working in the music business hierarchy and knew that to get this music
played on radio, it needed to be edited," he said in an interview.
"We always thought that if artists and record companies held fast, that
radio would come around and play music in its entirety, like classical
radio does and like jazz radio does." Side two of the band's 1970
widely popular second album -- the kind of album that sits in dads'
aging record collections -- famously contains the multi-song movement
Ballet for a Girl in Buchannon, including the hit Make Me Smile. In the
version edited for AM radio, the song's intro was shortened and the
final chorus was spliced from a reoccurring refrain much further down
the second side. The edited version sounded convoluted -- and helped
cause the band to begin losing some of its album-oriented,
rock-festival crowd for a more pop-minded audience.
Twenty years on, as the industry replaced LPs with CDs, an entirely
different take on albums arose -- the idea that more music wasn't
always a good thing artistically. Take another, perhaps less obvious
example, an album such as hip hop artists Pete Rock and C.L. Smooth's
nearly 80-minute 1992 disc Mecca and the Soul Brother. The album today
is a treasure trove of older style, James Brown-meets-R&B influenced
rap. But at the time, some criticized it as being overloaded by three
or four tracks.
The new idea then was that more songs per CD meant more value for
buyers. And in the case of Mecca, it was also a statement on DJ and
producer Pete Rock's highly prolific stretch at the time, remixing
numerous other rappers' tracks while also writing his own material. The
album has aged remarkably well. Yet could Mecca, in its entirety, be
released if it came out as a new album today?
At the same time, the CD era brought reissues also loaded up with extra
cuts -- partly in an effort to attract new buyers -- to the point where
old albums now seem sparse without all the bonus tracks and alternate
takes. It turns the CD reissue into more of a comprehensive history of
the artist at a particular time in his or her career, rather than just
an album. Few labels do this better than Sony's reissue label Legacy,
and here again Sony/Columbia is pushing the evolution of the album.
"We consider the original album to be critical, and we try in every
possible way to maintain the vision of that record as it was presented
in the marketplace upon [its original] release," said Jeff Jones,
senior vice-president of Legacy Recordings and Columbia Jazz.
Legacy's catalogue is a wealth of recorded history, but let's take one
example: The Notorious Byrd Brothers by the Byrds from 1968. Hidden
after the bonus tracks is a recorded argument between band members in
the studio, with drummer Michael Clarke getting the worst of it. It's a
marvellous addition. For me, it's the best thing about the reissue. But
it can't help changing the experience of the album.
Jones was adamant that Legacy never presumes to get into the mind of
past performers or try to know what they had intended beyond what was
actually recorded. Still, "I know that conversations take place where
that alternate take or that particular version of that song [are
discussed]. There was a reason why it wasn't on the record. There has
to be some musical evaluation and creative look at what material gets
added to existing records to make sure that we're not just adding
additional songs for the sake of advertising," Jones said.
Finally, yet another development is emerging in the history of albums'
(de)evolution: the re-emergence of shorter EPs and even strategically
distributed downloads and 12-inch singles, which in a way become test
releases for later albums.
The Brooklyn, N.Y., art-rock band TV on the Radio, for instance, with
their experimental, gospel-meets-Peter-Gabriel sound, garnered raves
from the indie-store set with their latest Young Liars EP last year,
adding to the anticipation for their upcoming album Desperate Youth,
Blood Thirsty Babes, expected next month. Another band, The Rapture
caught fire with Echoes, an album that had been much delayed for
business reasons, but which nevertheless made Pitchforkmedia.com's top
album of 2003 and had been heralded the previous year by the 12-inch
pressing of the band's guitar-driven dance track House of Jealous
Lovers.
"I think that a lot more artists are putting out EPs when they are new
and developing," said Denise Donlon, head of Sony Music Canada. "Do it
with more of an underground, independent feel for the [EP] release,
while you are working on the bigger opus, which will come with all the
bells and whistles and the marketing machine behind it, the big videos."
The problem for some artists is that the next step, in which producing
a "proper album" can mean more compromises.
"Whether or not you are going to end up with 10 or 15 tracks on [the
album], often there is a creative dialogue that happens between the
labels and the artists," Donlon said. "The labels says, well, that
song's got to go on it. And the artist says, no, this song is my
favourite, favourite track. . . . So sometimes, you may say that is an
artistic discussion between a label and artist that results in the
number of tracks."
That level of negotiations has been a part of the album-making process
since the birth of albums. But it must also drive some artists crazy
and make them want to tear down and build up the whole concept of the
album yet again in their own way.
--
_____________________________________________________________
Want to join the artnews listserv? go to:
http://www.pd.org/~zeug/artnews.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"The most obscure history is the history of the obvious."
Roberto Calasso
------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- [atlantaprog] Re: ARTNEWS death of the album?
- From: Kenneth L. Solomon - Progressive Soundscapes Radio
Other related posts:
- » [atlantaprog] Fwd: [ARTNEWS] death of the album?
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Fwd: [ARTNEWS] death of the album?
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Fwd: [ARTNEWS] death of the album?
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Fwd: [ARTNEWS] death of the album?
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Fwd: [ARTNEWS] death of the album?
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Fwd: [ARTNEWS] death of the album?
- » [atlantaprog] Re: Fwd: [ARTNEWS] death of the album?
- [atlantaprog] Re: ARTNEWS death of the album?
- From: Kenneth L. Solomon - Progressive Soundscapes Radio