[ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- From: André Michelle <am@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ascoders@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:44:06 +0200
> Was haltet ihr eigentlich von dem Boolean-valueOf()-Beispiel in der
> AS-Referenz?
Sinnlos ? Ja, oder ?
Das Tolle am Boolean.valueOf (standard) ist, wenn man Typensicherheit
ausschließen kann folgendes:
a = true;
b = false;
c = true;
trace( a + b + c ); // 2
Booleans geben nämlich 0 oder 1 zurück. Jetzt wird mir einiges klar.
Damit habe ich viele Zeilen sparen können:
http://www.andre-michelle.com/files/daily_trash_can/unsorted_waste/micropacman.as
nur Flash6, Actionscript1, aber es klappt.
Sinnlos ? Ja klar!
--
aM
------------------------------------------------------
Archiv : http://www.freelists.org/archives/ascoders/
Optionen : http://www.freelists.org/list/ascoders
------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- [ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- From: Florian Krüsch
- References:
- [ascoders] AW: SingleTon
- From: Jursa, Jan (init)
- [ascoders] Re: AW: SingleTon
- From: André Michelle
- [ascoders] valueOf vs toString
- From: André Michelle
- [ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- From: Ralf Bokelberg
- [ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- From: Ralf Siegel
Other related posts:
- » [ascoders] valueOf vs toString
- » [ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- » [ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- » [ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- » [ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- » [ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- » [ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- » [ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- » [ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- » [ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- [ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- From: Florian Krüsch
- [ascoders] AW: SingleTon
- From: Jursa, Jan (init)
- [ascoders] Re: AW: SingleTon
- From: André Michelle
- [ascoders] valueOf vs toString
- From: André Michelle
- [ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- From: Ralf Bokelberg
- [ascoders] Re: valueOf vs toString
- From: Ralf Siegel