[argyllcms] Re: targen and profile

Gerhard,
Thank you for your feedback. What's you "overall" experience with Argyll for printer profiles ? In which scenario do you use it ? 

Best regards,
Lorenzo

Gerhard Fürnkranz wrote:

Graeme,

my experience is that the verification result depends significantly on the distribution of the test set points used to assess the "resulting 
profile accuracy". My feeling is that I get in a majority of cases better average errors, whenever the same kind of distribution is used for 
both, the training set and the test set. For instance, "-I" training patches seem to give better result than the default, if the test set 
is generated with "-I" too (or "-R"), while vice versa default distributed taining patches seem to give better verification 
results, if the test set follows the default distribution too (or "-r"). But this makes it very hard to say, which one is really 
"better". Which is the "right" test set distribution to verify against?

Regards,
Gerhard

Other related posts: