[argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:15:19 +1100
Alastair M. Robinson wrote:
You're right, there's a typo (or at least, a grammatical error) there. Both your suggested corrections would be correct because, as Graeme said, they're equivalent.
Does this scan any better ? Note that this will only have an effect if an algorithm that uses perceptual placement (such as -R, -Q, -I or the default OFPS with an -A value > 0.0) is being used. Graeme Gill.
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter
- From: Alastair M. Robinson
- [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter
- References:
- [argyllcms] targen and -c parameter
- From: Vittorio Villani
- [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter
- From: Vittorio Villani
- [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter
- From: Alastair M. Robinson
- [argyllcms] targen and -c parameter
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] targen and -c parameter - Vittorio Villani
- » [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter - Vittorio Villani
- » [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter - Vittorio Villani