[argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter
- From: "Alastair M. Robinson" <profiling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:23:34 +0000
Hi, On 18/11/10 10:29, Vittorio Villani wrote:
I was asking if the sentence could have a typo in it, because I can't understand the meaning of: "Note that this will only have an effect IF an algorithm that uses the perceptual placement, such as -R, -Q, -I, or the default OFPS with an -A value> 0.0"
You're right, there's a typo (or at least, a grammatical error) there. Both your suggested corrections would be correct because, as Graeme said, they're equivalent.
All the best -- Alastair M. Robinson
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter
- References:
- [argyllcms] targen and -c parameter
- From: Vittorio Villani
- [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter
- From: Vittorio Villani
- [argyllcms] targen and -c parameter
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] targen and -c parameter - Vittorio Villani
- » [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter - Vittorio Villani
- » [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: targen and -c parameter - Vittorio Villani