[argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- From: Milton Taylor <milton.taylor@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:22:07 +1100
You can choose other energy rules, and they would probably
give other results. For instance, one could assume a reflective
environment illuminated with a particular white spectrum (ie.
completely flat, or daylight of some kind), and then compute
the gamut of every possible spectrum that could be produced
by subtracting from the illuminant. But this gamut would
exclude large areas that could be produces by quite practical
(and safe) emissive devices.
Other people have (perhaps) tackled this quandary. I'm not
sure what conclusion they came to.
I can see it would be useful perhaps to have two shapes then, i.e keep
them separate. One for 'safe emissive conditions', and one for typical
reflective conditions, assuming D50 white point with optimal lighting,
perhaps as you might find in a gallery [and not the average home
loungeroom].
Keeping them separate then reflects the true situation, ie that looking
at monitors and looking at prints is no where near an equivalent
experience, and would also stop people from making inappropriate gamut
comparisons.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [argyllcms] Verifying profile quality of LUT-based scanner and printer profiles
- From: Milton Taylor
- [argyllcms] Re: Verifying profile quality of LUT-based scanner and printer profiles
- From: Milton Taylor
- [argyllcms] Re: Verifying profile quality of LUT-based scanner and printer profiles
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- From: Frédéric
- [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- From: Milton Taylor
- [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- From: Graeme Gill
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- » [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- » [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- » [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- » [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- » [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- » [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- » [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- » [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- » [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- » [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- » [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- » [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
You can choose other energy rules, and they would probably give other results. For instance, one could assume a reflective environment illuminated with a particular white spectrum (ie. completely flat, or daylight of some kind), and then compute the gamut of every possible spectrum that could be produced by subtracting from the illuminant. But this gamut would exclude large areas that could be produces by quite practical (and safe) emissive devices.
Other people have (perhaps) tackled this quandary. I'm not sure what conclusion they came to.
- [argyllcms] Verifying profile quality of LUT-based scanner and printer profiles
- From: Milton Taylor
- [argyllcms] Re: Verifying profile quality of LUT-based scanner and printer profiles
- From: Milton Taylor
- [argyllcms] Re: Verifying profile quality of LUT-based scanner and printer profiles
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- From: Frédéric
- [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- From: Milton Taylor
- [argyllcms] Re: sRGB/AdobeRGB98 vs Lab (was Verifying profile quality...)
- From: Graeme Gill