nino loss wrote:
Would it be therefore better to leave out -r or to even increase it
above the average?
If you have no particular reason to change it, leave it at its default. It
has been set to a default that should be a good starting point.
If you have more information to go on (say you measured a similar
type of pigment chart with a lot more test patches, and can
use that to evaluate the underlying accuracy of the profile),
then you could tune the -r parameter to better suite your
device and situation. But of course if this is a one-off,
then you would simply use the more patches for your profile.
Graeme Gill.
