I'm trying too but the only problem is that I can't find the way to avoid white scaling to Y=100. You have to control the scanin result in the tiff file created with the -dipn option (look attachments). I think that the sampling boxes are not on target patches. I have created the .cht file for my miniCC with great effort and strange setting: BOX_SHRINK 40.0 but it seems work. I use: scanin -v2 miniCC.cht miniCC.cie colprof -v2 -q u -a m I'm using custom target value, the result is Profile check complete, peak err = 4.378222, avg err = 1.602803 with the white scaled and the resulting images too bright. Marco
Il giorno 04/ago/2011, alle ore 20:51, nino loss ha scritto: > Hello everyone, > > In these summer days, I'm (once again) trying to profile a camera with Argyll > for use with Capture One. I get very very strange and unusable results from > scanin and colprof. Till I'll get to a new more sophisticated target, I have > a new CC24. The .tif image of which gave very good results with other > software (which I do not want to use anymore...). I would greatly appreciate > your help with this: > > I used nothing but the commands described in "Typical usage Scenarios and > Examples": > scanin -v scanner.tif colorchecker.cht colorchecker.cie > colprof -v -D"Camera" -qm -am -u scanner > > This worked fine, only I see that the peak error is 102.779001 and the > average error is 37.968202 > > Thank your very much in advance for your help. > > sincerely > > nino > >