[argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- From: "Alastair M. Robinson" <profiling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 19:00:37 +0100
Hi,
Graeme Gill wrote:
It would only start to make sense if the gamut wasn't represented
as a surface, but as a 3 dimensional density mapping, and a rather
different gamut mapping algorithm was then used, or some sort
of thresholding was used to establish a gamut surface.
OK - thanks for confirming - I thought that was the case, I just wanted
to check there wasn't something else going on behind the scenes.
You have me wondering now about thresholding as a means of ignoring
outliers due to noise. Something to ponder. :)
I've tentatively renamed "profile" to "aglprof", and
"icclink" to "agllink", but I'm not terribly happy with either of them :-(
Just thinking aloud here - so ignore at will, but how about...
iccprof
mkiccprof
devlink
mkdevlink
mkicclink
All the best,
--
Alastair M. Robinson
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- From: Graeme Gill
- References:
- [argyllcms] noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- From: Alastair M. Robinson
- [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- From: Graeme Gill
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- » [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- » [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- » [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- » [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- » [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- » [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- » [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- » [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- » [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- » [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- » [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- » [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
It would only start to make sense if the gamut wasn't represented as a surface, but as a 3 dimensional density mapping, and a rather different gamut mapping algorithm was then used, or some sort of thresholding was used to establish a gamut surface.
I've tentatively renamed "profile" to "aglprof", and "icclink" to "agllink", but I'm not terribly happy with either of them :-(
- [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- From: Alastair M. Robinson
- [argyllcms] Re: noise and gamut, input profiles with B2A table
- From: Graeme Gill