[argyllcms] Re: how many patches, profiling Epson printers

  • From: Roger Breton <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:05:14 -0400

> As Graeme said, his algorithm needs some UV in the instrument light source
> in order that it can predict the FWA amount in the paper. Obviously, even
> (unfiltered) tungsten contains a sufficient UV amount for this purpose. But
> I'm wondering, whether the algorithm will work significantly more accurate
> with a Xenon flash, than with a tungsten lamp.

Considering that Graeme's work mostly revolved around the Spectroscan.

Yes.

Regards,

Roger Breton  |  Laval, Canada  |  graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. argyllcms
  3. Archive
  4. 07-2005