[argyllcms] Re: how many patches, profiling Epson printers

From: Roger Breton <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:02:36 -0400

> Argyll currently assumes an illuminant A light source for virtually all
> instruments, which is probably a reasonable approximation for instruments
> with tungsten lamps, but which if of course not correct, if an UV filter is
> used, or if e.g. a Spectrolino is equipped with a D65 filter. Graeme was
> also so kind to add on my request Spectrocam's Xenon flash spectrum to
> spectro/inst.c and xicc/xspect.c, which can be selected for FWA compensation
> by setting TARGET_INSTRUMENT to "Spectrocam" in the .ti3 file.
> 
> Regards,
> Gerhard

Ah! Looking forward to the article because I also have a SpectroCam.

Regards,

Roger Breton  |  Laval, Canada  |  graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx

References:

[argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms] how many patches, profiling Epson printers
From: Gerhard Fuernkranz

[argyllcms] Re: how many patches, profiling Epson printers

Other related posts: