[argyllcms] Re: gamut mapping
- From: edmund ronald <edmundronald@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:08:10 +0200
I don't think one should go there too much. If one applies such an
algorithm to some of the images in a magazine then other images and
other advertisers will look bad in comparison. I've seen this type of
thing happen, where a single *good* image wrecks a prospectus. My
feeling is this is very useful for art/photo purposes.
BTW, I've been using Argyll profiles, measured with a Barbieri LFP for
RGB exclusively for a year now. As far as I'm concerned, this
combination is good for production. I can make a Barbieri Argyll-based
push-button profiling system available if requested.
Edmund
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Klaus Karcher<lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> edmund ronald wrote:
>>
>> Note that adaptive gamut mapping is not something you want to over-use
>> if you are in prepress: Images in a batch containing the same colors
>> eg. various shots of the same model in the same dress, or scarves from
>> a collection silk-printed with the same dyes, need to match on the
>> printed page.
>
> There is the sequence gamut option in GaMapICC for that purpose: it assures
> that you get the same gamut mapping for all images of a series.
>
> Klaus
>
>
Other related posts:
