[argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: lee scratchy <leescratchy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:05:51 +0000
ok I guess it's implied that they meant :
Film density -> Three 1-D LUTs -> 3x3 Matrix through a 3D LUT -> Scene XYZ
BTW, there's also the hardware LUT :)
this app supposedly could tell my projector how to behave internally :
http://www.entechtaiwan.com/lib/softosd.shtm
maybe I'll be lucky and it will support 3D LUT
-Maxime
> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:33:50 +1000> From: graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To:
> argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through
> the LUT ?!> > > > well you can't do a 3x3 matrix with three 1D LUTs, can you
> ?> > No, but what's that got to do with what they said ?> > >>> Film density
> -> Three 1-D LUTs -> 3x3 Matrix -> Scene XYZ> >>> This Curve-and-Matrix model
> can be inverted exactly for converting> > Yes, this is quite true, and
> happens all the time in dealing> with ICC shaper+matrix profiles.> > Graeme
> Gill.>
_________________________________________________________________
Discover the new Windows Vista
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=windows+vista&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE
- References:
- [argyllcms] gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: lee scratchy
- [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: Hal V. Engel
- [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: lee scratchy
- [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: Hal V. Engel
- [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: lee scratchy
- [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: lee scratchy
- [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: Graeme Gill
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- » [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- [argyllcms] gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: lee scratchy
- [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: Hal V. Engel
- [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: lee scratchy
- [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: Hal V. Engel
- [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: lee scratchy
- [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: lee scratchy
- [argyllcms] Re: gamut conversion through the LUT ?!
- From: Graeme Gill