Second observation, I was not expecting that a DOS shell window would open
up with Argyll's prompts, to which I have to respond. This is fine. But I
have to confess I was expecting to be shielded from this "complexity": not
that the system is unworkable as it is, it is remarkable, but I did not
think this is what would happen.
I'll share my settings later but the resulting LUT profile wasn't great.
Maybe because I only ask for 127 samples to generate a LUT-base monitor
profile? In the skintones of some close-up portraits, in Photoshop, using
this first profile, there was some visible, less than flattering color
shifts and slight posterizations.
Second, using the EyeOnePro, I tried calibrating and create a profile under
the exact settings. Not better.
Third, I asked for 512 samples. This time, the color was very nice. Very
nice indeed.
