[argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms] Re: how many patches, profiling Epson printers

> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> The FWA compensation can't work if you have a UV filter fitted, since
> it relies on some UV from the instrument illuminant, to estimate the
> response of the FWA in the paper.

Graeme,

may I conclude:
The more UV is present in the instrument's light source, the more accurate
the prediction will be? Or is this a stupid assumption? E.g. can I expect a
better prediction for the radiance factors under D50, when I use a Xenon
light source, than with a tungsten lamp?

Regards,
Gerhard

-- 
5 GB Mailbox, 50 FreeSMS http://www.gmx.net/de/go/promail
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++

Other related posts: