[argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 18:04:13 +1000
tresorjoe@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
i've noticed that the saturation table by default is same or at least very similar to the
> perceptual table and the results after conversion with e.g. photoshop are
almost equal.
> the relative colormetric rendering intent shows very little difference as
well.
Unless you specify a source gamut (-S), there will be no separate perceptual or
saturation
intent tables (they will use the colorimetric table). You can see this if
you use iccdump, and notice that the offset for the three tags to the
tagtype is the same.
See <http://www.argyllcms.com/doc/profile.html#S>
and <http://www.argyllcms.com/doc/Scenarios.html#PP5>.
Graeme Gill.
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- From: tresorjoe
- [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- From: Roger Breton
- References:
- [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- From: tresorjoe
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- » [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- » [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- » [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- » [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- » [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- » [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- » [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- » [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- » [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- » [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- » [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- From: tresorjoe
- [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- From: Roger Breton
- [argyllcms] Re: [argyllcms]
- From: tresorjoe