[argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 16:34:18 +1100
Caspar Maessen wrote:
So, no NAME="%k" argument, because that is creating a new device
under /dev/ and none under /bus/usb/ and basically that is causing the
problem. The MODE="%k" argument doesn't work on the system-created
device. Looking for a solution I found the OWNER-argument, and that
solved it.
Thanks, that sounds pretty promising. I found it difficult to locate
a set of documentation of udev that was consistent. There seems to
be lots of variation, perhaps because it's a subsystem that has
changed rapidly. OSX wins for ease of using USB devices though :-)
Graeme Gill.
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- From: Frédéric
- References:
- [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- From: Caspar Maessen
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- » [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- » [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- » [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- » [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- » [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- » [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- » [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- » [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- » [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- » [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- » [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- » [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- » [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- » [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- From: Frédéric
- [argyllcms] Re: argyll v0.60.2 usb assignments
- From: Caspar Maessen