[argyllcms] Re: XRandR 1.2 is faulty...
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:11:07 +1100
David H. Vree wrote:
Is it safe to assume this is not a big problem for Argyll however?
It will fall back to older mechanisms, but they often have problems when there is more than one display. Graeme Gill.
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: XRandR 1.2 is faulty...
- From: David H. Vree
- [argyllcms] Re: XRandR 1.2 is faulty...
- References:
- [argyllcms] dispwin crashes with local scope on Ubuntu
- From: David H. Vree
- [argyllcms] XRandR 1.2 is faulty...
- From: David H. Vree
- [argyllcms] Re: XRandR 1.2 is faulty...
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: XRandR 1.2 is faulty...
- From: Hal V. Engel
- [argyllcms] Re: XRandR 1.2 is faulty...
- From: David H. Vree
- [argyllcms] dispwin crashes with local scope on Ubuntu
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] XRandR 1.2 is faulty... - David H. Vree
- » [argyllcms] Re: XRandR 1.2 is faulty... - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: XRandR 1.2 is faulty... - Hal V. Engel
- » [argyllcms] Re: XRandR 1.2 is faulty... - David H. Vree
- » [argyllcms] Re: XRandR 1.2 is faulty... - David H. Vree
- » [argyllcms] Re: XRandR 1.2 is faulty... - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: XRandR 1.2 is faulty... - David H. Vree