[argyllcms] Re: Wow.

On 2006 May 4, at 7:32 PM, Graeme Gill wrote:

> Ben Goren wrote:
>
>> I  just  made my  first  print  with a  no-holds-barred  Argyll
>> profile (3680 patches pre-conditioned  from an earlier profile,
>> ultra quality). It was  a test sheet I've  just finished making
>> with  a few  of  my  own favorite  photos  and some  chart-type
>> things.
>
> Good  to hear  you  got  a great  result. I'm  not sure  there's
> any  reason  to  use  -qu  ("Ultra")  though.  -qm  or  -qh  are
> perfectly reasonable settings. The only reason -qu exists, is to
> prove  that it's  not needed! [Perhaps  I need  to rename  these
> options. "Quality"  is a  bit misleading. It's  more to  do with
> resolution of the interpolation grid, hence processing time, and
> it may or may not translate to better quality of result.]

Um...gee, thanks. /Now/ you tell me!

How 'bout renaming it to  ``Useless Overkill''? That way, the flag
can stay the same but poor schmucks like me will get the point....

Cheers,

b&

Other related posts: