[argyllcms] Re: Wow.
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 12:32:09 +1000
Ben Goren wrote:
I just made my first print with a no-holds-barred Argyll profile
(3680 patches pre-conditioned from an earlier profile, ultra
quality). It was a test sheet I've just finished making with a few
of my own favorite photos and some chart-type things.
Good to hear you got a great result. I'm not sure there's any
reason to use -qu ("Ultra") though. -qm or -qh are perfectly
reasonable settings. The only reason -qu exists, is to
prove that it's not needed! [Perhaps I need to rename these
options. "Quality" is a bit misleading. It's more to
do with resolution of the interpolation grid, hence
processing time, and it may or may not translate to
better quality of result.]
Graeme Gill.
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Wow.
- From: Ben Goren
- References:
- [argyllcms] Wow.
- From: Ben Goren
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Wow.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Wow.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Wow.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Wow.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Wow.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Wow
- » [argyllcms] Re: Wow.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Wow
- » [argyllcms] Re: Wow
I just made my first print with a no-holds-barred Argyll profile (3680 patches pre-conditioned from an earlier profile, ultra quality). It was a test sheet I've just finished making with a few of my own favorite photos and some chart-type things.
Good to hear you got a great result. I'm not sure there's any reason to use -qu ("Ultra") though. -qm or -qh are perfectly reasonable settings. The only reason -qu exists, is to prove that it's not needed! [Perhaps I need to rename these options. "Quality" is a bit misleading. It's more to do with resolution of the interpolation grid, hence processing time, and it may or may not translate to better quality of result.]
- [argyllcms] Re: Wow.
- From: Ben Goren
- [argyllcms] Wow.
- From: Ben Goren