Hi, I have a question regarding the workflow when printing at a photo lab. Here is how I usually work: I shoot with a digital DSLR, either in Raw or as AdobeRGB Jpegs. I edit them in Lightroom and/or Photoshop (Monitors calibrated and profiled with argyllcms XYZ Lut + swapped matrix), export them as jpegs with full quality in Adobe rgb (the profile my photo lab recommends for prints) and send them to the lab. Since Lightroom did not have a soft proof capability until a few days ago I did not bother to go into photoshop to check a softproof for most of the photos. Usually this worked pretty well. But just today I got a batch of prints where the colours are pretty far from what I wanted. The motive is a portrait with low saturation and a skin colour that is relatively pink. In the print the colours show a lot less saturation and the skin looks blueish. I just checked the new lightroom 4 soft proof as well as photoshop's soft proof (with the profile provided by my photo lab) and if "Simulate Paper Color" is turned on the image looks very much like the print - lower saturation and skin tones and highlights that are shifted into the blue part of the spectrum. I guess the "correct" way to handle this problem would be to convert the photos into the target colour space (the profile my photo lab provides) with a perceptual intent and submit this to the lab. If I understand the basics of colour management correctly (big if ;) ), then this should counter the colour shifts introduced by the paper colour (which I think is the whitepoint?) as best it can. Unfortunately all the labs I know here in Germany only accept sRGB or AdboeRGB files as input. So here comes my question: Is there a tool/workflow in the argyllcms toolchain that I can use to create an AdobeRGB Jpeg that has "photo lab compensation" applied to it? So that I could not bother softproofing every photo in lightroom and instead just export them as, say, 16 bit tiff in ProPhoto RGB, send it to the argyllcms tool and get "photo-lab compensated" AdobeRGB Jpegs out of it? Any thoughts on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Best regards, Daniel -- Daniel Bachler http://www.danielbachler.de http://www.iconoclash-photography.com phone, address: http://www.danielbachler.de/contact