[argyllcms] Re: What colorchart I should buy?
- From: Klaus Karcher <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 13:52:30 +0100
Davide wrote:
Hi all, first of all Happy New Year!
Happy New Year :-)
I just take a look into colorcharts to profile my DSLR camera, and I
found that Colorchecker SG from X-Rite it's one of the most popular.
Reading around I discovered that Xrite doesn't provide the reference
file for that chart..
In "ref" dir of Argyll I found it but I think it doesn't came from Xrite
directly but it's a user contribution right?
Argyll contains only the .cht file (i. e. the test chart recognition
template) but no .cie file (CIELAB or XYZ measurement values) for the
ColorChecker SG.
At the moment, the only way to obtain XRite's reference file is to
install one of the Xrite Profiling packages (e.g. ProfileMaker). You
don't need a ProfileMaker dongle for this purpose.
At Graeme's urging [1] Thomas Kunz (XRite) announced that Xrite will
publish separate reference files on their website soon -- see
<http://lists.apple.com/archives/Colorsync-users/2009/Dec/msg00128.html>
To obtain the CIE values from the ProfileMaker installation, you can use
eihter Argyll's logo2cgats and spec2cie tools or XRites MeasureTool
(part of the ProfileMaker installation). ProfileMaker's MeasureTool will
only export D50/2° data in demo mode, but that's what you need most
likely anyway.
The spectral data file is located in the ProfileMaker subdirectory
"Reference Files/Scanner/", filename: "Digital ColorChecker SG.txt".
(Feel free to contact me off-list if you need further assistance).
I should consider buy that chart or some one else?
Free to give me suggestion :)
ColorChecker SG is a very good target for "general purpose" camera and
scanner profiles as it contains a well-balanced mix of common, "natural"
spectra.
Other (photochemical manufactured or printed) targets are often biased
towards the manufacturing process they originate from and are less
suitable to represent the spectral properties of natural scenes. Those
targets can outperform ColorChecker SG in their special domains, but for
general purpose camera profiles ColorChecker SG is the first choice IMHO.
Klaus
[1] whole discussion: Thread "CororChecker SG CIE reference values (or
lack of)" in
<http://lists.apple.com/archives/Colorsync-users/2009/Dec/threads.html> and
<http://lists.apple.com/archives/Colorsync-users/2009/Dec/thrd2.html>)
Other related posts: